I haven't read about it, but a similar thing happened to a lady who was able to switch back to w/o on the subsequent update. No question asked. Just wasted Rs.50 and half a day.
During an address update, the w/o XX was changed to c/o XX. I don't think it was a human error as we know the person / people who processed it. When checking in digilocker, the discrepancy was found and fixed with another update. Are you talking about something else?
Never heard of any issues, yet. Probably, another standard is being forced to make things more complex and confusing. Will let you/everyone know if I heard any issues due to this new standard.
“Despite numerous Duare Sarkar camps, the couple did not receive benefits from the state Government schemes like Tapashili Bandhu or Lakshmi Bhandar,” he said.
A public interest litigation (PIL) petition before the Calcutta High Court has challenged the validity of Regulation 28A of the Aadhaar (Enrolment and Update) R
The Calcutta High Court on Thursday ordered the Central government to respond to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) petition challenging the provisions of the A
How mandatory Aadhaar-linked authentication of ration cards continues to keep out the marginalised sections of society from the public distribution system.
This website uses affiliate links. This means that if you click on a link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission. This does not affect the price you pay for the product.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.