Tata Sky DTH: Cable on steroids will `hit` DTH

  • Thread starter Thread starter disher
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 24
  • Views Views 6,295

disher

all in one!!
Messages
255
Location
NA
ISP
ADL
The new HITS will enable cable operators to offer better quality TV feed to subscribers. J K Jain, the Delhi-based doctor-turned-politician/media owner, is unusually happy these days. His company, Jain Studios, that started a news and current affairs channel some years ago, sees a new business opportunity in the revival of HITS — the head-end in the sky platform proposal. His excitement about Trai’s (Telecom Regulatory Authority of India) HITS recommendations, sent to the government earlier this month, is palpable. “We have an earth station in Greater Noida and can easily launch operations,” claims Jain. HITS is back in news. Five years ago, Jain Studios and Zee Group’s ASC Enterprises managed to get permission to launch HITS, that is, delivery of satellite channels to the cable operator through a head-end in the sky (located on a satellite) rather than through an on-ground control room. Simply put, a HITS operator encrypts all TV channels at a common facility and uplinks them to a satellite (head-end in the sky). These are then beamed back to various digital cable head-ends from where they reach the consumer through cable. Today, a multi-system operator (MSO) or a large independent cable operator downloads each TV channel signal from the broadcaster’s satellite. In HITS, he will be able to download the whole bouquet of channels from the HITS operator’s satellite. “At one go, cable can go all-India and become digital as well as addressable, if HITS is allowed,” says Ashok Mansukhani, president (corporate affairs) at Hinduja TMT that operates the InCable network. In its recent recommendations to the government, the Trai says that only a registered cable operator or a registered MSO could operate HITS. To get a HITS licence, the company will need to pay an entry fee of Rs 10 crore and furnish a bank guarantee of Rs 40 crore. Broadcasting companies and/or DTH licensees will not be allowed to collectively hold more than 20 per cent of the total paid up equity in a HITS company. Similarly, a HITS licensee should not hold more than 20 per cent equity share in a broadcasting company and/or DTH licensee company. The HITS licensee has to commence uplinking/downlinking operations within a year of receiving spectrum allocation. Interestingly, the Trai does not insist on HITS using “C” band satellite, as the government mandated earlier. The regulatory authority says that either Ku or C band transponders can be used. (DTH uses only Ku band transponders). Also, as in the case of telecom, 74 per cent FDI is permitted for a HITS operator. But before digging into the pros and cons of HITS recommendations, it is important to see what it can mean for the consumer. For starters, HITS is a digital platform and can offer more channels than analog cable. At the consumer end, like the conditional access system (CAS), channels are received via a set top box. “Frankly, there is no difference between HITS and DTH except that HITS is direct-to-operator while DTH is direct-to-home to a consumer,” says Dish TV’s managing director Jawahar Goel, who is said to have lobbied hard for HITS to drive Zee group’s cable business under WWIL. HITS scores over DTH as unlike in the case of satellite operators, cable has a return path that makes interactivity easy for services such as video-on-demand, pay-per-view and so on. Media industry estimates say that by 2010, nearly 50 per cent of television ARPUs will come from content on demand. Adds Goel: “HITS can offer VoIP, broadband, telephony and much else without really any extra wiring.” Besides, unlike in DTH, billing is at the consumer’s doorstep. For the cable industry, HITS may be its only chance to fight the onslaught of DTH and other content delivery platforms like IPTV and mobile TV. Vikram Kaushik, Tata Sky Ltd’s CEO and managing director, expects rapid conversion of the existing cable market into DTH. “Several independent agencies say that India would have 15-30 million DTH subscribers by 2015. My estimate is that the DTH market should touch 25 million subscribers by that time,” says Kaushik. Since digital is the only way forward, MSOs such as InCable and Hathway are installing digital head-ends in each of their markets to offer CAS. But the cost of going digital city-wise is prohibitive — a digital head-end could cost up to Rs 2.5 crore. “If you downlink digital signal from a HITS operator, you need equipment worth Rs 2-3 lakh,” says Goel. Adds E Jayaraman, Hathway Cable’s head: “The operational expense of maintaining multiple head-ends is also high. If you have them in, say, 25 cities, you need managers and engineers in all those 25 cities.” Since HITS allows cable to cover the country digitally at one go, will it affect DTH operators? Kaushik refuses to comment on HITS and its effect on DTH penetration. However, industry experts say that today, few MSOs (there are at least 6,000 of them) can afford to become HITS operators since it entails an investment of Rs 200-300 crore. “DTH companies already have the back-end and are likely to be allowed to have 20 per cent equity in a HITS operator. They could be interested in this platform,” says a media industry expert. To be sure, HITS may have to overcome many roadblocks before becoming a reality. First, the Trai recommendations have to be approved by the government. Two, HITS won’t succeed unless CAS is compulsory. “If CAS is not made mandatory, HITS will be a non-starter. Why will a consumer buy the set top box? Voluntary CAS has not really taken off,” says a distribution expert. The cost of the box is high at Rs 3,000. “It is a chicken-and-egg situation. We need volumes to bring the price down and vice-versa,” says Mansukhani. A media marketing expert, however, sees it as a lame excuse. “Nowhere in the world is CAS mandatory. It depends on marketing and your value proposition.” Even if the consumer bites the bait, HITS operators may have to scramble for transponder capacity, which is in short supply, be it on Ku band or C band. Additionally, in the Ku band, experts say, rain disrupts signals, especially in markets like Mumbai. Still, Jain’s enthusiasm remains unchanged. He says he is looking for an investor for his HITS venture. However, since his permission for HITS is already five years old, the future of HITS and his project remains unclear.


Shuchi Bansal: Cable on steroids will `hit` DTH
 
Dude are you daydreaming about providing better service by the ****ing cableguy operator:madness:
 
Why should anything be mandatory? If people want to watch two channels on a twenty year old B&W tv, so be it. The govt. and industry should stop trying to pad their pockets at the consumer's expense. Put out a value proposition and people will buy. But that takes time and is inefficient, isn't it? Beating people into submission is so much easier. They should also get one more thing into their thick skulls - do not create legal hurdles in the use of technology.
 
Dude are you daydreaming about providing better service by the ****ing cableguy operator:madness:

I second that + cable walla kabhi nahi sudre ga... kute ki dum tadi ke tadi..
 
@vgpalI am not that good in understanding in technical aspects. Can you tell me how the mso can provide cable connection to customers and how are we going to benifit. Is hits something like DTH where MSO give a small to customer and to receive their connection. Correct me if i am wrong
 


@ajuravi007
I have also privided a link on the topic :

"HITS on Ku-Band is Detrimental to Cable TV Industry
HITS signal is broadcast on C-Band so that it is differentiated from DTH, which is on Ku-Band and direct-to-home. HITS is thus complementary to Cable Networks and competitor to DTH.

Wherever HITS is functioning in the world it is being used to-

(a) Deliver cable TV signals to all the headends of an MSO to avoid putting up many headends, when the area covered is very large.

(b) Downlinking and uplinking of signals can be done at one place only, to have better control of content, in that the content is monitored using a delay mechanism and uplinked after due editing.

(c) To carry out advertisement ingestion before uplinking.

If HITS technology uses Ku-Band there is no difference left between a DTH company and a Cable TV company or an MSO.

(a) By acquiring a HITS license, a DTH company can use their existing infrastructure to carry out distribution of signals to individual households using MDU technology which is nothing but a cable network for Ku-Band.

(b) Similarly, since a small dish is required for receiving Ku-Band signals, an MSO with HITS license can also distribute signals direct to subscribers who can use a Ku-Band dish to receive the signals like any other DTH subscriber.

If the above becomes a reality, why should the HITS operators use the cable networks of the existing Cable Operators? They will always like to by pass them. As it is, there is no cross media restriction implemented so far. We have so many large companies enjoying monopoly in the media market, we shall encourage it further by allowing HITS on Ku-Band.

If these companies are also telecom companies like Reliance and Bharti and content producers like Star TV, Zee Network and Sun TV, they will also be masters of other distribution platforms like Broadband, IPTV and Mobile TV."


http://www.cable-quest.in/landmark_judgment.asp
 
“Frankly, there is no difference between HITS and DTH except that HITS is direct-to-operator while DTH is direct-to-home to a consumer,” says Dish TV’s managing director Jawahar Goel, who is said to have lobbied hard for HITS to drive Zee group’s cable business under WWIL.
Surely the whole point with DTH has been to cut the cable guy & his shit infrastructure out of the loop. So we the public can enjoy interference free broadcasts anywhere in the country and not have to worry when the power goes out, whether the cable operators UPS battery or generator needs to be upgraded.


HITS scores over DTH as unlike in the case of satellite operators, cable has a return path that makes interactivity easy for services such as video-on-demand, pay-per-view and so on. Media industry estimates say that by 2010, nearly 50 per cent of television ARPUs will come from content on demand. Adds Goel: “HITS can offer VoIP, broadband, telephony and much else without really any extra wiring.” Besides, unlike in DTH, billing is at the consumer’s doorstep.
Is that the "steroids" they are talking about ? ...the return path .

I thought movies on demand or pay -per-view was already possible with DTH.

As it is telecom companies are having enough probs delivering 'broadband' to us, i'm not sure whether the cable operators will be able to do better in this space.

The biggest problem with wired delivery in this country is the cables always being cut. Unless its deliverred to you armour sheathed & underground, this is one area where DTH will always be better.
 
HITS is a threat not only to DTH but to cable operators also. MSO will provide service to residential complexes directly.

There is an article in cable quest on this.
 
@mek76There is no difference between DTH and HITS."If HITS technology uses Ku-Band there is no difference left between a DTH company and a Cable TV company or an MSO. (a) By acquiring a HITS license, a DTH company can use their existing infrastructure to carry out distribution of signals to individual households using MDU technology which is nothing but a cable network for Ku-Band. (b) Similarly, since a small dish is required for receiving Ku-Band signals, an MSO with HITS license can also distribute signals direct to subscribers who can use a Ku-Band dish to receive the signals like any other DTH subscriber."
 
HITS will work out cheaper if you are an MSO planning on providing digital cable. It won't add much to an independent cable operator other than the fact that he might be able to offer more channels via analog cable than he can at present, that too if the HITS operator and laws are agreeable to this.The two-way stuff is crap. If the signals go from HITS operator to cable operator and he in turn sends them to a digital STB, how does that enable two way communication - broadband, VOIP, telephony or even Movies on Demand? The communication, if any, will be restricted to those connected by the cable.And why place technical restrictions as in C-band yes, Ku-band no? This is a business. If cable operators and smaller MSO's are so afraid, they should get the hell out.
 
@crzayshahI am still confused on that. vgpal provided the link but still i am confused as i am not able to understand totally the meaning of Hits & the difference between DTH & HITS:wall:
 
@aju,HITS provide signals to the MSOs from where they will telecast via existing cable network, whereas DTH provides signals to the consumer directly.
 

Top