Reliance Jio Fiber Static IPV6 IP

  • Thread starter Sonu2007
  • Start date
  • Replies: Replies 45
  • Views: Views 7,652
Lolita_Magnum

Lolita_Magnum

🦜
Messages
1,347
Location
Mumbai
ISP
ARTL-24560
VIL-55410
SLN-208959
HTZ-24940
Sadly, you can't. Jio does not provide/sell static ipv6, plus with the recent increase in censorship from Jio, your better bet would be to go for the local ISP, if it's any good.
 
Last edited:
C

cadddr

Messages
9
Location
Home
ISP
Local ISP
Jio does not provide/sell static ipv6
Unfortunate. I will take a trial and see how it goes with jio, since my local isp also has latency problems(200-240ms to europe, even bsnl dsl did it better), and complaining about it doesn't help. Thanks for your inputs.
 
Lolita_Magnum

Lolita_Magnum

🦜
Messages
1,347
Location
Mumbai
ISP
ARTL-24560
VIL-55410
SLN-208959
HTZ-24940
200-240ms, would probably mean Tata is the transit provider for your ISP. Same case for me. Has been that way for years, would probably never change, unless they build a better or a new sea cable.
BSNL uses Sri Lankan Communication, hence better pings, you can try Airtel, if it's available in your region, regardless Jio will have the lowest latencies to Europe compared to anyone else.
 
C

cadddr

Messages
9
Location
Home
ISP
Local ISP
It's airtel.

Code:
  5    38 ms    37 ms    37 ms  nsg-corporate-253.56.185.122.airtel.in [122.185.56.253]
  6   231 ms   230 ms     *     182.79.206.46
  7     *      243 ms   243 ms  linx-224.retn.net [195.66.224.193]
  8     *      241 ms   241 ms  ae0-3.RT.SRV.DRO.NL.retn.net [87.245.232.44]
  9     *      234 ms   233 ms  GW-Serverius.retn.net [87.245.246.51]
 
Lolita_Magnum

Lolita_Magnum

🦜
Messages
1,347
Location
Mumbai
ISP
ARTL-24560
VIL-55410
SLN-208959
HTZ-24940
Seems to be an issue with specific router itself, as it seems to be located in India but still has such high latencies. It's understandable now, why you'd ask local ISP for solution.
 
Lolita_Magnum

Lolita_Magnum

🦜
Messages
1,347
Location
Mumbai
ISP
ARTL-24560
VIL-55410
SLN-208959
HTZ-24940
Regardless, still better latencies than Tata.
9 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 172.23.78.237
10 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms ix-ae-0-100.tcore1.mlv-mumbai.as6453.net [180.87.38.5]
11 320 ms 320 ms 320 ms if-ae-2-2.tcore2.mlv-mumbai.as6453.net [180.87.38.2]
12 315 ms * * if-ae-16-2.tcore1.svw-singapore.as6453.net [180.87.12.226]
13 144 ms 144 ms 144 ms if-et-23-6.hcore2.kv8-chiba.as6453.net [180.87.12.74]
14 144 ms 144 ms 144 ms if-et-1-2.hcore1.kv8-chiba.as6453.net [120.29.211.2]
15 313 ms * 313 ms if-ae-5-2.tcore2.sv1-santaclara.as6453.net [209.58.86.142]
16 317 ms 317 ms 317 ms if-ae-26-2.tcore1.sqn-sanjose.as6453.net [209.58.86.37]
17 312 ms 312 ms 312 ms if-ae-12-2.tcore1.nto-newyork.as6453.net [63.243.128.28]
18 314 ms 314 ms 315 ms if-ae-7-2.tcore1.n0v-newyork.as6453.net [63.243.128.26]
19 312 ms 312 ms 312 ms 216.6.90.57
20 291 ms 294 ms 291 ms ae0-3.rt.srv.dro.nl.retn.net [87.245.232.44]
21 291 ms 291 ms 291 ms gw-serverius.retn.net [87.245.246.51]
 


C

cadddr

Messages
9
Location
Home
ISP
Local ISP
Wow, that seems worse. The other problem with local isp is the next hop of their router itself has 35ms, it used to be worse when they had it somewhere in delhi with 65ms.
 
Lolita_Magnum

Lolita_Magnum

🦜
Messages
1,347
Location
Mumbai
ISP
ARTL-24560
VIL-55410
SLN-208959
HTZ-24940
If it's across a country/crossing through states, then 35ms is understandable.

Latencies to the IP above from JioFiber Mumbai is around ~240ms, so from your location it should be around 260-280ms.
 
Last edited:
Lolita_Magnum

Lolita_Magnum

🦜
Messages
1,347
Location
Mumbai
ISP
ARTL-24560
VIL-55410
SLN-208959
HTZ-24940
6 2 ms 4 ms 1 ms 172.26.76.244
7 4 ms 4 ms 4 ms 172.26.76.227
8 8 ms 1 ms 2 ms 192.168.53.178
9 10 ms 2 ms 2 ms 192.168.53.179
10 25 ms 2 ms 3 ms 172.31.2.73
11 5 ms 4 ms 4 ms 103.198.140.174
12 112 ms 98 ms 98 ms 103.198.140.107
13 111 ms 102 ms 101 ms 103.198.140.27
14 130 ms 108 ms 104 ms 103.198.140.107
15 134 ms 134 ms 153 ms hu0-7-0-11.ccr21.mrs01.atlas.cogentco.com [149.14.125.1]
16 170 ms 172 ms 184 ms telecomitalia.mrs01.atlas.cogentco.com [130.117.15.6]
17 189 ms 170 ms 177 ms ae14.francoforte73.fra.seabone.net [195.22.205.119]
18 190 ms 240 ms 250 ms clouvider.francoforte73.fra.seabone.net [195.22.214.161]
19 224 ms 288 ms 310 ms 91.238.82.11
20 199 ms 165 ms 233 ms 91.238.82.13
21 274 ms 265 ms 185 ms 91.238.82.43
22 301 ms 293 ms 281 ms 91.199.118.184
On a 150Mbps line, the speeds are ~65-98Mbps and 135 when using a download accelerator.
 
C

cadddr

Messages
9
Location
Home
ISP
Local ISP
I have now subscribed to jio fiber, and latency is much better(<180ms) to most of europe(both v4/v6 routes).

Regarding the /64 prefix subnet i am pretty sure jio doesn't share that with other customers, since you can enable dhcpv6 stateful allocation and the address pool is fixed:
LuR6cUJ.png


The problems:
  • ssh connection drop after few minutes(need to investigate).
  • block cloudflare warp, i would need a dedicated VPN for wireguard.
 
A

a.c

Messages
810
Location
Delhi
ISP
Excitel
Yeah I mean then there's nothing to investigate per say. It's an issue with all providers using CGNat, who have a large client base