Quad9 DNS Service: 9.9.9.9

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sushubh
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 28
  • Views Views 7,183
Since when Quad9 got an Indian server? Last time I used the nearest server was in Singapore.


Source

Edit: They had a Bombay server earlier but it was only for peered ISPs.
Edit2: For a sec I thought I had DNS Leak but I tried few other DNS providers and they were working fine.
 
Quad9 has presence in Kolkata as well, IIFON DC in Kolkata has them as a peer, getting good latency to them with Alliance but not sure if should switch from Cloudflare.
 
@HC1337 Their website only shows one location of server inside India which is at Bombay.


It's good that they have peered with more ISPs here in India. Wish they had peering with Excitel in Delhi.
Edit: I think I talked to Quad9 support last year about some routing issue (which turned out was a issue on my ISP's side), they were very helpful. That's when they said they are trying to increase presence in India.
 
I will share the traceroute when I head back to my college, after a week to be precise.
I am certain IIFON dc in Kolkata was in the trace.
 
It has indian server in MUM now.
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=0 ttl=59 time=32.450 ms


64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=59 time=32.817 ms


64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=59 time=31.923 ms


64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=59 time=31.737 ms


64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=4 ttl=59 time=32.334 ms


64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=5 ttl=59 time=32.625 ms


64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=6 ttl=59 time=32.274 ms


64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=7 ttl=59 time=33.191 ms


64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=8 ttl=59 time=31.929 ms


64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=9 ttl=59 time=32.118 ms
 
I am getting 62-65ms ping, prolly connecting to SG server.
 


I was using Excitel (Jio Upstream) at my cousin's place. Now back to Airtel and awful ping in 280s.
 
This is the traceroute for me on Excitel (used IP from dnsleaktest.com)
Tracing route to 125.20.246.123 over a maximum of 30 hops

1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms dlinkrouter.local [192.168.0.1]
2 2 ms 1 ms 1 ms ****
3 3 ms 2 ms 2 ms ****
4 2 ms 1 ms 1 ms 14.141.116.229.static-Delhi.vsnl.net.in [14.141.116.229]
5 21 ms 20 ms 21 ms 172.28.176.222
6 24 ms 24 ms 24 ms 115.110.234.142.static.Mumbai.vsnl.net.in [115.110.234.142]
7 30 ms 30 ms 31 ms 116.119.109.26
8 23 ms 24 ms 24 ms 125.20.246.123


This is the traceroute for me on Airtel 4G (used IP from dnsleaktest.com)
Tracing route to res132.qsin1.rrdns.pch.net [74.63.20.236]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 22 ms 26 ms 2 ms 192.168.162.119
2 51 ms 28 ms 36 ms 10.0.232.4
3 * * * Request timed out.
4 * * 43 ms 10.206.248.161
5 52 ms 36 ms 58 ms 125.17.210.37
6 179 ms 130 ms 128 ms 116.119.68.220
7 125 ms 119 ms 128 ms 42.sgw.equinix.com [27.111.228.1]
8 132 ms 130 ms 129 ms res132.qsin1.rrdns.pch.net [74.63.20.236]

Airtel routing is F'ed up. Not only it doesn't use Mumbai server (which might have to do with peering) but the routing to Singapore is horrible, it should around 70-75ms for that IP and not 130 ms.
 
Last edited:
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| WinMTR statistics |
| Host - % | Sent | Recv | Best | Avrg | Wrst | Last |
|------------------------------------------------|------|------|------|------|------|------|
| openwrt.lan- 0 | 31 | 31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 10.23.31.1 - 0 | 31 | 31 | 16 | 16 | 18 | 17 |
| node-203-171-241-1.alliancebroadband.in - 86 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 35 | 35 | 35 |
| No response from host - 100 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 103.74.224.208 - 0 | 31 | 31 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 17 |
| dns9.quad9.net - 0 | 31 | 31 | 17 | 17 | 18 | 18 |
|________________________________________________|______|______|______|______|______|______|
As observed, Quad9 does have presence in Kolkata as well, and the traffic goes through IIFON DC.
I get 17 - 18ms to Alliance gateway in Kolkata.
 

Top