the blog post owner contacted me with some requests. i fulfilled everything. but he even had issues with the description of the updated plans. i mean what the F. you want me to remove the description of speculative plans even when i have added a source link? i thought there was something called fair use.
anyways. i have added the warning in the first post and removed the link to the source. we are not in the
business of publishing speculations as confirmed news items.
---------- Post added at 04:49 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:36 PM ----------
adding the link to the original source because the dude claimed that i was not being very nice to him.
