both mtnl and bsnl are government services, mtnl is providing some cheap plans like 1gb @ rs76, 200gb for rs 750/month.then why bsnl can not provide such plan for rest of india???
well if it comes to 3g then in my place, airtel, idea, vodafone and bsnl 3g networks are present. whose 3g tariff plans are too high.i live in kanpur, uttar pradesh
no docomo 3g yet, but i know their 3g plans in other circles which still expensive as the subject of this thread. and obviously this thread is a question to the government and for our self thinking. what they would reply in metros like delhi mumbai, more poor peoples are staying???
both mtnl and bsnl are government services, mtnl is providing some cheap plans like 1gb @ rs76, 200gb for rs 750/month.
then why bsnl can not provide such plan for rest of india???
If MTNL Delhi can, then why MTNL Mumbai cannot?
Even MTNL Mumbai is providing good speeds at cheap rates and there are more rich people and more subscriber base in Mumbai than delhi.
Chennai & I think even Kolkatta were separate individual units. Chennai Telephones was merged into BSNL - It happened after a brief fight, as many within the old Chennai Telephones felt they would loose on a lot of facilities which were given by the state, but some negotiations helped the merger to happen. But I personally think certain parts of the Chennai unit still function as a sub-unit or a separate unit than as part of the larger BSNL.
This website uses affiliate links. This means that if you click on a link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission. This does not affect the price you pay for the product.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.