Also dont forget Gov rule of min 2mbps speed for indian BB.
[*] It's 512k as of April or so (it was supposed to be January) - 2mbps doesn't come in to effect until 2015.
[*] This is a bullshit "regulation" because even when it will be effected, it only covers how they can advertise the plan. An ISP can still offer a 512k or 1mbps Internet plan, they just can't call it broadband. It's basically a name change, that is all.
[/list]
It's unlikely to actually change anything except the base price of what can be referred to as broadband: if they didn't change the price, you'll still be able to get Internet for Rs500 or 750 or 1000 a month, but broadband will start at 1500 or 2000 or whatever.
To actually change what is being offered, the regulations need force more specific technical measures on the various methods of internet access, such as acceptable limits for the SNR and attenuation on
ADSL, for example, as well as more specifics on what can be allowed on FUP'd plans, where contention ratio can/should be measured and less ridiculous peering costs.
Personally, I'd favour full-speed ADSL up to a data cap of the user's choice (which could be anything from 5 to 500GB depending on how much the user wants to pay, for example) before the line gets rate-limited to 128k or 256k or whatever, otherwise a speed-rated line (1, 2, 4, 8, 16mbps for example) should not be subject to an FUP, but possibly traffic shaping as can be necessary, and again, priced reasonably, rather than how MTNL has done in Mumbai and charges 9999 for 4mbps against 999 for 1mbps (How could they possibly explain that? You'd think buying "in bulk" would get you a discount per megabit!)
Of course, Wimax, 3G, LTE, WiFi, HFC, FTTB & FTTH would have their own set of regulations according to those technologies as well.