Aadhaar Judgement by Supreme Court of India

i thought current cji who has been super controversial is avoiding giving aadhaar ruling under his tenure. but he would only retire in october next year so that makes little sense.
 
 
So weird. The first Gazette notification didn't announce a date and 2 hours later Ministry of Finance says its 31st March 2018.
 
Final hearing starts from January 11 or January 17.
Interim relief ruling to be out tomorrow.
 


After a wait of two and a half years, SC lists final date for Aadhaar hearing to begin January 17


On Thursday, a five member bench of the Supreme Court heard the Aadhaar matter. The hearing today had several positive developments, and we now wait for the formal order to follow. Today’s hearing despite concerns is a positive outcome also as the court has given a date for final hearing, which has been pending for nearly two and half years now.

The Supreme Court has now fixed final arguments in the Aadhaar matters to start next year, from January 17, 2018. Following this, the date of hearing may vary by two or three days but arguments will now start. The formation of the constitutional bench which sat today is likely to be the same for the final hearing.

The deadlines for linking are extended till March 31. This may include bank linking, mobile and Public Distribution System ration and other welfare schemes. As of now, there is not sufficient clarity on the scope of the extension of deadlines, and this will be confirmed only by tomorrow.

Questions on whether today’s extension applies to all residents, or only those who have not yet enrolled and received an Aadhaar number, is something which can only be confirmed after the text of the order becomes available later today. However, extensions now stands in principle before the final hearing.

Discussion in court

The lawyers for the petitioners took the court through all the previous orders that had been passed for the last few years, and pointed out that most the notifications being made had no statutory backing. The AG representing the UoI argued that the UoI is not responsible for these notifications.
Several senior counsels argued against mandatory linking of Aadhaar to essential services. Senior counsel Gopal Subramanium pointed out that the Court had exercised judicial power in favour of citizens, to insulate them against compulsion, or any form of force through which they would have to part with their personal information. It had repeatedly passed interim orders to protect citizens’ dignity and fundamental rights, with its interim orders in the case. But violating the spirit of the court’s interim orders, the 139 notifications passed by the central government under Aadhaar Act made Aadhaar mandatory for nearly every aspect of a citizen’s life.
Senior counsel Arvind Datar argued that if one assumed that Aadhaar could be made compulsory under Section 7 of Aadhaar Act, that applied only for services paid for by the Consolidated Fund of India, or the government treasury. He questioned why was government asking citizens to produce Aadhaar for everything from examination hall tickets to death certificates, matters which had nothing to do with the Consolidated Fund.
The lawyers requested the Court for an interim stay on mandatory linking of services pending final adjudication.

Besides these positive developments, legal experts have pointed out that there may be some risk as the previous orders of the court are being supervised by the order which will be pronounced tomorrow.

We now wait for the final text of the Supreme Court Order, and we will issue another update soon.

Rethink Aadhaar
 
sadly they seem to have made aadhaar mandatory for opening new accounts from the looks of it.
 
Sad 🙁

In March they will extend it again till Oct 2018 and so on.

Slowly slowly whole nation would have linked Aadhar.

And then Government will say --- "Look majority of people have linked it, so its not issue for the citizens and its accepted."
 
final hearing begins in january so it should be decided by march end whether we are fucked or not.
 

Top