Aadhaar Card is not a proof of age

[Sushubh]

Rakhi Rani And Another vs State Of Haryana And Others on 2 June, 2017

in Court, as an 'Aadhar Card' cannot be accepted at face value to be proof of age, in view of what was stated by the Deputy Director of the UIDAI, who had been summoned to Court in a similar matter, that no proof of age is taken by that authority at the time of issuance of such Aadhar Card. Therefore, the age given in the Aadhar Cards of petitioner no.2 cannot be accepted as a genuinely verified age.

 

[amish]

LOL and just few years back Aadhar was added in list of sufficient documents for PAN card.

For Identity, Address and Date of birth!

Here is the link which says Aadhar is enough for date of birth.

TIN

 

[Navjot Singh]

Where is the link?

 

[amish]

Dont know how link vanished. Here it is:

TIN

 

[Sushubh]

Aadhaar Card Can Be Considered As Proof Of Age: Delhi HC , Disagrees With Madras HC | Live Law

 

[Sushubh]

Aadhaar Entries Not Conclusive Proof In Criminal Cases: Allahabad HC [Read Judgment]

The Allahabad High Court has observed that entries in Aadhaar Card indicating address, date of birth etc., cannot be regarded as conclusive proofs in criminal cases.

 

---

[Sushubh]

Aadhaar not firm proof of age: Punjab and Haryana High Court

The Punjab & Haryana High Court has held that Aadhaar is not a firm proof of age (Navdeep Singh vs. State of Punjab) Justice Amol Rattan Singh made the obse

www.barandbench.com

 

[Sushubh]

Fresh advisory soon on Aadhaar as date of birth proof

The UIDAI is likely to issue a clarification soon that those relying on the Aadhaar as proof for age may do so after undertaking a ‘risk-based assessment’.

www.thehindu.com