FTP Unavailable on ACT Fibernet Broadband
- Thread starter tibin lukose
- Start date
-
- Tags
- act braodband act chennai ftp nat
Going way off topic here but interesting, IPv6 ping is lower.
Tracing route to broadbandforum.co [2607:f298:5:104f::c2a:39fe]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 2002:7ab4:a1a0:1::1
2 70 ms 71 ms 71 ms 2002:c058:6301::1
3 80 ms 73 ms 81 ms 10ge1-5.core1.sin1.he.net [2001:470:0:17b::1]
4 190 ms 195 ms 185 ms 100ge6-2.core2.mrs1.he.net [2001:470:0:3f5::2]
5 186 ms 186 ms 185 ms 10ge5-2.core1.mrs1.he.net [2001:470:0:3c3::2]
6 196 ms 192 ms 192 ms 10ge3-1.core1.bcn1.he.net [2001:470:0:31c::2]
7 394 ms 393 ms 390 ms ntt-6.02.01.catnix.net [2001:7f8:2a:0:2:1:0:2914]
8 397 ms 406 ms 399 ms ae-10.r25.amstnl02.nl.bb.gin.ntt.net [2001:728:0:2000::12d]
9 294 ms 296 ms 302 ms ae-5.r23.asbnva02.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [2001:418:0:6000::10d]
10 301 ms 295 ms 295 ms ae-20.r06.asbnva02.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [2001:418:0:2000::116]
11 296 ms 336 ms 296 ms ae-1.a03.asbnva02.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [2001:418:0:2000::2e1]
12 302 ms 304 ms 302 ms 2001:418:0:5000::18f
13 306 ms 304 ms 304 ms ip-2607-f298-5-cc01--1.dreamhost.com [2607:f298:5:cc01::1]
14 303 ms 302 ms 302 ms ip-2607-f298-5-ccf2--2.dreamhost.com [2607:f298:5:ccf2::2]
15 302 ms 302 ms 303 ms broadbandforum.co [2607:f298:5:104f::c2a:39fe]
Trace complete.
Tracing route to broadbandforum.co [173.236.194.106]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.1.1
2 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms abts-north-static-076.220.160.122.airtelbroadband.in [122.160.220.76]
3 2 ms 2 ms 2 ms abts-north-static-177.130.160.122.airtelbroadband.in [122.160.130.177]
4 2 ms 2 ms 2 ms abts-north-static-121.176.144.59.airtelbroadband.in [59.144.176.121]
5 5 ms 4 ms 4 ms 182.79.181.74
6 48 ms 46 ms 85 ms 182.79.198.31
7 43 ms 48 ms 42 ms 182.79.189.223
8 76 ms 92 ms 83 ms 182.79.245.169
9 73 ms 74 ms 75 ms xe-0-1-0-9.r00.sngpsi05.sg.bb.gin.ntt.net [116.51.27.181]
10 73 ms 76 ms 73 ms ae-10.r20.sngpsi05.sg.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.7.18]
11 238 ms 238 ms 238 ms ae-8.r22.snjsca04.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.3.48]
12 310 ms 311 ms 317 ms ae-7.r23.asbnva02.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.6.238]
13 313 ms 312 ms 313 ms ae-20.r06.asbnva02.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.2.133]
14 308 ms 306 ms 306 ms ae-1.a03.asbnva02.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.5.214]
15 322 ms 320 ms 320 ms ae-0.dreamhost.asbnva02.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.196.242]
16 319 ms 316 ms 319 ms ip-208-113-156-8.dreamhost.com [208.113.156.8]
17 309 ms 309 ms 309 ms ip-208-113-156-75.dreamhost.com [208.113.156.75]
18 317 ms 318 ms 323 ms ps380171.dreamhost.com [173.236.194.106]
Trace complete.
Ipv4 using airtel routing again shows how poorly they do it, going from Singapore to California to Virginia, so basically trans pacific.
Tracing route to broadbandforum.co [2607:f298:5:104f::c2a:39fe]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 2002:7ab4:a1a0:1::1
2 70 ms 71 ms 71 ms 2002:c058:6301::1
3 80 ms 73 ms 81 ms 10ge1-5.core1.sin1.he.net [2001:470:0:17b::1]
4 190 ms 195 ms 185 ms 100ge6-2.core2.mrs1.he.net [2001:470:0:3f5::2]
5 186 ms 186 ms 185 ms 10ge5-2.core1.mrs1.he.net [2001:470:0:3c3::2]
6 196 ms 192 ms 192 ms 10ge3-1.core1.bcn1.he.net [2001:470:0:31c::2]
7 394 ms 393 ms 390 ms ntt-6.02.01.catnix.net [2001:7f8:2a:0:2:1:0:2914]
8 397 ms 406 ms 399 ms ae-10.r25.amstnl02.nl.bb.gin.ntt.net [2001:728:0:2000::12d]
9 294 ms 296 ms 302 ms ae-5.r23.asbnva02.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [2001:418:0:6000::10d]
10 301 ms 295 ms 295 ms ae-20.r06.asbnva02.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [2001:418:0:2000::116]
11 296 ms 336 ms 296 ms ae-1.a03.asbnva02.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [2001:418:0:2000::2e1]
12 302 ms 304 ms 302 ms 2001:418:0:5000::18f
13 306 ms 304 ms 304 ms ip-2607-f298-5-cc01--1.dreamhost.com [2607:f298:5:cc01::1]
14 303 ms 302 ms 302 ms ip-2607-f298-5-ccf2--2.dreamhost.com [2607:f298:5:ccf2::2]
15 302 ms 302 ms 303 ms broadbandforum.co [2607:f298:5:104f::c2a:39fe]
Trace complete.
Tracing route to broadbandforum.co [173.236.194.106]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.1.1
2 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms abts-north-static-076.220.160.122.airtelbroadband.in [122.160.220.76]
3 2 ms 2 ms 2 ms abts-north-static-177.130.160.122.airtelbroadband.in [122.160.130.177]
4 2 ms 2 ms 2 ms abts-north-static-121.176.144.59.airtelbroadband.in [59.144.176.121]
5 5 ms 4 ms 4 ms 182.79.181.74
6 48 ms 46 ms 85 ms 182.79.198.31
7 43 ms 48 ms 42 ms 182.79.189.223
8 76 ms 92 ms 83 ms 182.79.245.169
9 73 ms 74 ms 75 ms xe-0-1-0-9.r00.sngpsi05.sg.bb.gin.ntt.net [116.51.27.181]
10 73 ms 76 ms 73 ms ae-10.r20.sngpsi05.sg.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.7.18]
11 238 ms 238 ms 238 ms ae-8.r22.snjsca04.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.3.48]
12 310 ms 311 ms 317 ms ae-7.r23.asbnva02.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.6.238]
13 313 ms 312 ms 313 ms ae-20.r06.asbnva02.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.2.133]
14 308 ms 306 ms 306 ms ae-1.a03.asbnva02.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.5.214]
15 322 ms 320 ms 320 ms ae-0.dreamhost.asbnva02.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.196.242]
16 319 ms 316 ms 319 ms ip-208-113-156-8.dreamhost.com [208.113.156.8]
17 309 ms 309 ms 309 ms ip-208-113-156-75.dreamhost.com [208.113.156.75]
18 317 ms 318 ms 323 ms ps380171.dreamhost.com [173.236.194.106]
Trace complete.
Ipv4 using airtel routing again shows how poorly they do it, going from Singapore to California to Virginia, so basically trans pacific.
Last edited:
#3 . so working from home is business from your POV, i bet you don't have to you office VPN to access your mail from home . Please do not tell me about policies, its nowhere mention FTP connection is chargeable. They can put a torrent cache in their network & promote piracy but block FTP connections ?
If its malpractice is malpractice, today FTP, and tomorrow SMTP, how long we as customer suffer ?
#4 i don't have money to pay for VPN, will you pay for me ?
Apart from ACT i don't have any other option, as Airtel have 512kbps upload speed, and i moved to ACT because of their upload speed so that i can upload files to work server. gigabits of binary files.
They have not intimated me before blocking my ports.
Last edited:
This thread went off topic and then argument unfolds... but why?
The OP hasn't come back to clarify what he meant. ACT indeed does double NAT and it affects HOSTING a FTP server from your connection. Not connecting to one. Big difference.
If you really need to host an FTP server, do it on a non standard port and have it open from ACT - ACT will give you a free private static IP with a bunch of ports open (usually its all, but they're limiting it now). Or, just pay up for a static and move on? I don't see how net neutrality is in question. It's not like they're limiting FTP connectivity to their favorite server or something.
IPv4 shortage is a big problem for ISPs like ACT who entered the game late, unlike BSNL and Airtel who are sitting in a pool of addresses.
The OP hasn't come back to clarify what he meant. ACT indeed does double NAT and it affects HOSTING a FTP server from your connection. Not connecting to one. Big difference.
If you really need to host an FTP server, do it on a non standard port and have it open from ACT - ACT will give you a free private static IP with a bunch of ports open (usually its all, but they're limiting it now). Or, just pay up for a static and move on? I don't see how net neutrality is in question. It's not like they're limiting FTP connectivity to their favorite server or something.
IPv4 shortage is a big problem for ISPs like ACT who entered the game late, unlike BSNL and Airtel who are sitting in a pool of addresses.
Sorry, I had to quote on you on this one but, which ISPs DON'T block outgoing SMTP? Email spam is a real problem, and due to the lack of IPv4 addresses, ISPs are trying to block spammers misusing their IPs. I don't know the extent of such limitation here in India, but it's generally a big problem everywhere else.
Here is an answer for you. Take them to consumer court. And good luck. I can only suggest you alternatives. I cannot fix your problem with your ISP. Part about commercial activities on home connection is important for taking them to courts. That's why I said, check their policies.
act cc cleerly states they or running out ipv 4 addresses so they nat with private ip and they also mentianed(for me) because of this i will fase connection drops and i can not able to open ports agane if dont like change your provider
and btw @ Sushubh started this forrom to discus the problems of internet users and keep in mind that your not paying him hens blaming him is not correct trols like you should kicked out of the forrom
Hi members
i am new to this forum
i have a problem with act broadband connecting with fizezilla client
they asked me to purchase a static ip to work
i also purchased paying them 2500 rs one but still i could not connect the filezilla
i get this following error
can anyone help me out
Response: 220---------- Welcome to Pure-FTPd [privsep] [TLS] ----------
Response: 220-You are user number 2 of 150 allowed.
Response: 220-Local time is now 09:21. Server port: 21.
Response: 220-This is a private system - No anonymous login
Response: 220-IPv6 connections are also welcome on this server.
Response: 220 You will be disconnected after 5 minutes of inactivity.
Command: AUTH TLS
i am new to this forum
i have a problem with act broadband connecting with fizezilla client
they asked me to purchase a static ip to work
i also purchased paying them 2500 rs one but still i could not connect the filezilla
i get this following error
can anyone help me out
Response: 220---------- Welcome to Pure-FTPd [privsep] [TLS] ----------
Response: 220-You are user number 2 of 150 allowed.
Response: 220-Local time is now 09:21. Server port: 21.
Response: 220-This is a private system - No anonymous login
Response: 220-IPv6 connections are also welcome on this server.
Response: 220 You will be disconnected after 5 minutes of inactivity.
Command: AUTH TLS