Can this composition of Indian Constitution Work ?

Messages
1,769
Can this composition of Indian Constitution Work ?






[*]Instead of relying on the unrelated and unqualified ministers for approval , now the head of each department , for eg , Head of Nuclear department can propose plans in the parliament .

[*]The People elected representatives can either approve or disapprove the said plans based on the merits / demerits .

[*]Retired SC Judges can give great insight into the legalities of the proposed plan.

[*]Concerned civil groups can make suggestion , point out the flaws etc.

[*]Opposition which is now largely a speed breaker in almost all proposal by the ruling party will be now removed from the equation , yet still be given appropriate representation. Also its no longer a matter of this party vs that party.

[*]Now the HOD`s have to propose and describe each plans in detail , their merits, demerits , cost involved , sectors benefiting etc to the entire members and similar to current system , the voting will take place at the end of the proposal and possible amendments to be made.

[*]This will largely remove the "ignorant" factor posed by the unqualified (education wise) politicians in blocking good proposals

[*]The civil group will be changed or willing citizen can participate ,register their thoughts and appropriately vote.

[*]All proposals will be announced in advance and civil groups / citizens who wish to register their thoughts will be selected at random.

[*]No more can a party simply pass laws after laws without any opposition (mostly walked out) , each one has to be discussed now.

[*]As Ruling party will be no more than a voting / opposing group , corruption , scandals , imo can be reduced (They will find loop holes at the end of the day) , and when the money making capabilities are reduced , it will be no longer seen as a profession for making money , and greedy will eventually quit , at least that's what i imagine !!

[*]All HOD`s will be elected in a transparent manner by the usual election process which happens via respective departments.

[*]People now have direct say on their society and for their jobs as they now elect two representative.

[*]This also removes the brains behind each minster (currently) to propose their plans independently without the interference of ministers. This IMO , is the greatest benefit of all.
[/list]

IMHO , one shouldn`t be authoritative over a subject ,if he doesn't know that subject or have experience in it
 

raman_286

Regular
Messages
176
Location
Ambala
Idea seems great.....but the grave question is,"Will the law makers make such amendment ?" The current composition is also very good given the people running it are not corrupt.....
 
Messages
1,769
Idea seems great.....but the grave question is,"Will the law makers make such amendment ?" The current composition is also very good given the people running it are not corrupt.....

just a simple question , Do you know how nuclear reactors work or what safety is in place? No offence to you though. I dont even know it.

I cant have the last say , if i am a minister , on whether a law / proposal pertaining to say , Information and Technology. I need to have some background on that subject to give my rational approval or disapproval.

more than being corrupt or not corrupt , one has to understand the proposals , willingness to learn. What good can we achieve from lawyers ( I heard our most of the politicians are lawyers) on matter of science and technology ?

As one said , to fix a leaking pipe , you need a plumber , not a lawyer or doctor.
 

iCon

masoom kameena!
Messages
3,221
someone has to do it!

Absolutely True! But looking at our so called SYSTEM, its really stupid thing to expect that our politicians will even give a ***c to this kind of idea, take the example of latest Lokpal idea, its dying slow death.
 


iCon

masoom kameena!
Messages
3,221
More Lolzz(hehe)..means our politicians are not giving it ***k for last 50 years! Naveen bro has to wait for atleast 100 years.
 
Messages
1,769
@iCon ,I agree with you , that politicians see this as a threat to thier status quo . This is just a outline , the framework , laws to this will need huge contribution , as the checks and balance needs to be perfect. I always think that like our software , we need to have a system for our laws to have version , this is mostly to block the loop holes in the existing laws. Make it crowd sourced and each submission given votes . Already framed laws should be opened to monetary benefit for those who come with finding a hole .Those laws which are created this way shouldn't be interfered by SC at any cost , after all , they are there to execute the framed laws. But in given situation , i very much love what SC is doing.The benefits needs to be weighed and explained in detail to many and in particular to rural people.
 

SVK

svknet.wordpress.com
Messages
9,870
Location
svknet.wordpress.com
I agree that there should be group apart from Politicians who could give their opinions on critical and important issue. If all decisions are taken by Politicians, we would always see result like "Indian Rail Budget 2012" :)
 

Similar threads


Top