"The Government is understood to have rejected telecom regulator TRAIs recommendations on mobile number portability (MNP) saying this should not be mandated by the Licensor or the Regulator, as it would deny subscribers the freedom to change operator without changing the number.
Since MNP is not a mandatory service and in view of the competitive environment, it was felt that the sharing of cost upgradation for such facilities should not be mandated by the Licensor (Department of Telecom) or the Regulator and should be left to the commercial judgement of the service providers, sources said.
TRAI had in March recommended that
DoT implement the facility by April 2007, saying the Government may mandate all Cellular Mobile Service Providers to offer MNP, initially to be introduced within the service area only.
DoT is of the view that these recommendations are not covered under the particular clause of the TRAI Act 1997 and therefore, in case of not accepting the recommendations, it is not necessary to refer them back to TRAI before taking a final decision.
It is pertinent to mention that some of the countries like Japan have already implemented MNP and according to analysts, both operators and subscribers have benefited.
Further, DoT noted that the MNP cannot be implemented across all mobile subscribers due to technical variations between GSM and CDMA
The Government is understood to have rejected telecom regulator TRAIs recommendations on mobile number portability (MNP) saying this should not be mandated by the Licensor or the Reg- ulator, as it would deny subscribers the freedom to change operator without changing the number. Since MNP is not a mandatory service and in view of the competi- tive environment, it was felt that the sharing of cost upgradation for such facilities should not be mandated by the Licensor (Department of Telecom) or the Regulator and should be left to the commercial judgement of the service providers, sources said. TRAI had in March recommended that DoT implement the facility by April 2007, saying the Government may mandate all Cellular Mo- bile Service Providers to offer MNP, initially to be introduced within the service area only. DoT is of the view that these recommendations are not covered un- der the particular clause of the TRAI Act 1997 and therefore, in case of not accepting the recommendations, it is not necessary to refer them back to TRAI before taking a final decision. It is pertinent to mention that some of the countries like Japan have already implemented MNP and according to analysts, both operators and subscribers have benefited. Further, DoT noted that the MNP cannot be implemented across all mobile subscribers due to technical variations between GSM and CDMA "
HINDUSTAN TIMES DEC 04, 2006