@power,The linux and mac clients still use the old protocol (which is used in alternative clients), so I really dont think there is a way to distinguish between official and unofficial.And isn't MAC binding independent of the client? All clients send the MAC address to the server, where it is verified.
-
Amazon Deals - ToS - Warp
Don't use alternate clients.
- Thread starter humm
- Start date
- Replies 19
- Views 4,166
I know all about the new versus old protocol. Currently that is the ONLY way to identify, but I don't think they can sue - all you have to do is say that you are using the linux client - WHICH THEY HAVE NOT UPDATED, THE STINKING BAS*****
EDIT: See Ujjwal has already mentioned that.
As regards MAC address, well some of the clients simply allow you to enter a value, but the older ones (ES1) do not - and they still work (or did work). Apparently Sify's servers only considered the MAC address binding if they received some value for MAC
EDIT: See Ujjwal has already mentioned that.
As regards MAC address, well some of the clients simply allow you to enter a value, but the older ones (ES1) do not - and they still work (or did work). Apparently Sify's servers only considered the MAC address binding if they received some value for MAC
There is a new linux dialer for sify....
https://sourceforge.net/projects/antidialer/
try it out if u are a linux user
https://sourceforge.net/projects/antidialer/
try it out if u are a linux user
[/quote]
Hi,
Does anyone know what license the clients are distributed in? If the protocol/dialers have any licenses accompanying them then what we are doing (reverse engg, even using the proprietary protocol) could actually turn out to be illegal.
Are there any lawyers/licensing experts here who can put some light on this issue?
Regards,
Siddhesh