And why again is Airtel better than Jio?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aakshey
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 66
  • Views Views 13,431
@Kick933 how exactly does CG-NAT hampers performance? I'm really curious to know. As far as I understand, except the applications which need open NAT like P2P gaming, everything should work fine and it shouldn't affect things like latency in other applications.
NAT requires more CPU on ISP infra and I think it creates a bigger state table. So, NAT will have atleast some effect on performance.
 
Dear @gopichandpai, If its not related, why did they send a technician to my house saying that they will do a plan change via app on their mobile. I guess they want access to my ont for doing this.

When I said that mine is in bridge mode, he said that's the reason why it was not done automatically. I reverted it by the time he came home. He did something and it was done immediately. Any how, now that since the ont is back in bridge mode, I'll try a plan change again after few days and check if it gets done without any issue.
You are right its related to bridge mode only - as same happened with me as well and engineer had to visit my place and replaced the modem. On bridge mode when they try to run the job at backend its gets stuck that what engineer explained to me.
 
@Kick933 how exactly does CG-NAT hampers performance? I'm really curious to know. As far as I understand, except the applications which need open NAT like P2P gaming, everything should work fine and it shouldn't affect things like latency in other applications.
Since we do not have direct up address,our data packet go to NAT server of ISP before reaching to the gateway.It usually add 3x the latency for the same pathway AFAIK.CG-NAT was not designed to be used forever.It was just a way to smoothen transition to IPV6.But turned out to be disaster as telecom companies still do not go with IPV6.
 

Top