Suggestion for Gigabit router for BSNL FTTH

Kick933 said:
Sorry,but the data you are corresponding to belongs to 2017...
The signal loss does not matter as long as you maintain sanity in installation.
And as far as We consider....GEPON is evolving and less overhead loss is available for majority of data.
Anyways.... Most LCO prefer GEPON due to less technical stuff requirement.You can easily place an OLT for each radius of 20km .It is specifically useful for rural areas due to practicality of cable operations along with ftth
Click to expand...
Dude, did you read anything at all?

Why are you only focusing on signal loss? Signal loss doesn't matter for any kind of PON if you have proper amplification.

GPON is superior in every way including QoS and it's the future of PON-networking.

LCOs prefer GEPON/EPON because they are cheaper and less technical as you said not because it's better.
 
Well this is a little bit off topic. But cablelabs has introduced docsis 4.0 which has downlink speeds of 10gbps and 5 gpbs uplink repsectively. Many countries are using it more than optical fiber but in india optical fibers are gaining traction.
 
I've not followed the cable internet situation closely, but the advantage of PON is that it's passive, and has a range of upto 10-20 km and doesn't need any active boosters on the way, even the splitters are entirely passive.

Plus the cables are relatively cheap, making it very very cheap to maintain a PON network as compared to the legacy coax cable network.

This is one of the main reasons why operators are moving to PON.
 
Last edited:
@varkey
@Dark_Nate
Sorry,my mess
I have been messed up with EPON and GPON.
Sorry,some personal issues going on...
I agree that GPON is better standard since both are passive optical network standard.
I apologize for the same.....
😅
 

varkey said:
I've not followed the cable internet situation closely, but the advantage of PON is that it's passive, and has a range of upto 10-20 km and doesn't need any active boosters on the way, even the splitters are entirely passive.

Plus the cables are relatively cheap, making it very very cheap to maintain a PON network as compared the legacy coax cable network.

This is one of the main reasons why operators are moving to PON.
Click to expand...
Yeah but already developed cable infrastructure doesnt need much changes for adaption to newer docsis standards isnt it . Only their cable plants ie.cmts needed to upgraded isnt it plus modems . in US and all fibre connections are rarely there
 
Yeah, but here in India, you can just run cables through the poles, same can't be done in the US or other countries. Replacing the existing coax network with fiber for last mile would be more expensive there as compared to doing the same in India. 🤪
 

Top