Yes, from what I heard in a video each district is now equipped with 200Gbps switching capacity. But that doesn't necessarily mean 200Gbps internet, more like they can switch packets till NIB at 200Gbps.
1:1 internet connections are costly because you are essentially getting full link capacity all the time and since it is not shared, someone has to pay for the charges to maintain this network, national and international transit charges.
Most of us are with 1:20, 1:40, or even 1:90 contention for home connections. Suppose that an ISP has 100Mbps 1:1 connection they will share with 20 or 40 or 'X' # of users until they can run it profitably. ISPs share this 1:1 connection believing not all the users are consuming bandwidth together. Hence the slow speed in peak times.
1:1 internet connections are costly because you are essentially getting full link capacity all the time and since it is not shared, someone has to pay for the charges to maintain this network, national and international transit charges.
Most of us are with 1:20, 1:40, or even 1:90 contention for home connections. Suppose that an ISP has 100Mbps 1:1 connection they will share with 20 or 40 or 'X' # of users until they can run it profitably. ISPs share this 1:1 connection believing not all the users are consuming bandwidth together. Hence the slow speed in peak times.
